
Human–AI collective intelligence
When do AI agents strengthen collective reasoning, and when do they only make agreement look easier than it is?
- Human–LLM deliberation
- Responsible AI learning
- Generative-agent validity
I develop validated relational methods for understanding how people, artificial agents, and markets interact, and for turning complex structural evidence into decisions that are interpretable, reproducible, and actionable.
01 / Research architecture
How can relational evidence make complex systems more understandable, valid, and actionable?

When do AI agents strengthen collective reasoning, and when do they only make agreement look easier than it is?

How can relational evidence reveal value formation, trust, and recovery pathways across physical and digital markets?
Model actors, objects, attributes, and time as relational systems.
Network motifs · attributed graphs · NLPSeparate a model that fits from one that can support a claim.
Null models · holdouts · calibrationTurn structural evidence into decisions, tools, and interventions.
Simulation · decision analytics · open pipelines02 / Current work
My current projects test whether computational patterns can survive the checks needed for explanation and decision-making.
Collective intelligence
Responsible AI
Social simulation
Sustainable markets
03 / Selected publications
04 / Academic practice
My academic practice connects methodological rigor with accessible education and reusable tools. I teach data and database subjects while developing research workflows that make validation visible and reproducible.
Database systems, data analytics, AI ethics, and computational research practice.
I welcome collaborations on human–AI interaction, complex networks, sustainable markets, and rigorous social simulation.
05 / Contact
For research collaboration, student supervision, invited talks, or academic exchange:
tengfei.shao@toki.waseda.jp